TekfenKagıthane办公园区
TekfenKagıthane Office Park
Tekfen大厦是该集团最近进行的一项重要投资，它建在Buyukdere大道的Levent-Maslak轴线上，该大道已成为伊斯坦布尔最新的商业骨干。考虑到它的建筑表现以及它的预测和内部正在进行的生活，Tekfen大厦是本世纪末建造的一般办公建筑的典型例子。
Tekfen Tower, a prominent investment that the group has made recently, is built on the Levent-Maslak axis on the Buyukdere Avenue which has transformed into Istanbul’s latest back bone of commerce . Both considering its architectural representation and its predicted and ongoing life inside, Tekfen Tower is a typical example of the generic office structures that were built at the end of the century.
可以认为，这个结构在技术精度方面与它的同类建筑相比具有很强的能力，它的可持续技术和功能设备已经独立于其周围环境。另一方面，如果说在这条轴线上建造的所有建筑都是出于类似的动机，那也不会有错。我们可以很容易地宣称，由这些作为封闭的岛屿的建筑组成的系列，以及在它们之间留下的毫无意义的空隙，创造了一种深刻的城市匮乏。
It can be assumed that this structure which has highly competent qualities in terms of technological precision comparing it to its look-alikes, has been made independent from its surroundings with its sustainable technical and functional equipment. On the other hand, it would not be wrong to say that all of the structures that were built on this axis has been built with similar motivations. It can be easily claimed that the series that are composed of these structures which are built as closed islands and the meaningless voids that are left in between them, creates a profound urban deprivation.
沿着Buyukdere大道继续前进的商业轴线随着Maslak地区北部的森林逐渐消失。留在东部的Boğaziçi地区是一个住宅区，大部分已经达到了它的建筑能力。在不久的将来，这个地区不应该有彻底的转变。显然，这条轴线产生的对新商业区的渴求，使Kagıthane地区，一个相当原始的地区，直到20世纪最后25年一直是奥斯曼帝国现代主义最突出的工业中心，具有吸引力。
The commercial axis that continues along the Buyukdere Avenue fades with the forest on the North of the Maslak region. The Boğaziçi region that is left on the east, is a residential district that has mostly reached its building capacity. A radical transformation in the near future in this region should not be expected. It is evident that the hunger for new commercial regions that this axis produces, makes the Kagıthane region, a fairly pristine area that has been the most prominent industrial center of the Ottoman Modernism till the last quarter of XX. century, alluring.
看来，最重要的转型潜力将不可避免地在这个山谷及其周边地区显现。特别是过去几年在Halic的投资，使这一论断合法化了。Kagıthane办公园区是TekfenGroup的投资，它已经预见到了该地区的潜力。有趣的是，该集团要求在该地区建造新的办公大楼，因为他们也是Tekfen大厦的投资者。另一方面，在过去的几年里，同一地区的其他项目也出现了，这清楚地表明该集团的预测并不孤单。
It seems that it will be inevitable that the most important transformation potentials will be revealed in this valley and its surrounding. Especially the investments that were made in Halic in the last years, legitimises this assertion. Kagıthane Office Park is an investment of the TekfenGroup which has foreseen the potential in the region. It is interesting to see this group requesting for a new office building in this region, as they are the investors of the Tekfen Tower as well. On the other hand, other projects that are also in the same region that has come up in the last years demonstrate clearly that the group is not alone in their predictions.
Kagıthane的转型肯定不会是单向的。然而，不难估计，为解决物质环境的现有状态而采取的行动，是转型的最关键因素，也会带来社会问题。对于一个习惯于分析背景事实的建筑师来说，这种估计将不可避免地成为一种负担。另一方面，现有的结构和社会学模式，由转型潜力引发的野心，以及开发Tekfen Tower这样的建筑的投资集团的期望，这些交织在一起的现实给这个负担增加了重量。可以很容易地宣称，在每个项目中以不同方式表现出来的负担所产生的张力，是办公园区项目设计中最重要的标准。
The transformation in Kagıthane will not be unidirectional for sure. However, it is not hard to estimate that the moves that will come up to solve the physical environment’s current existing state which is the most crucial instrumant of the transformation, will bring along social problems as well. This estimation will inevitably appear as a burden for a designing architect who is used to analyzing the contextual facts prominently. On the other hand, the existing structural and sociological patterns, the ambitions that are triggerred by the transformation potentials and the expectations of the investment group that has developed a building like Tekfen Tower, are intertwined realities that puts even more weight on this burden. It can be easily claimed that the tension that is produced by the burden which demonstrates itself differently in every project, is the most important criteria in the design of the Office Park Project.
在设计的第一阶段，对场地及其周围进行了深入的分析。该地区不同的社会学和物理层被分解。通过对未来的预测，如物业、改造模型和修复程序，对现有模式的现状进行了研究。高度详细和全面的数字模型简化了对不同规模的感知体验和地形影响的思考。
In the first phase of the design, the site and its surrounding has been analyzed in depth. The different sociological and physical layers in the region were decomposed. The existing pattern was examined in its current state by making future projections like the property,transformation models and rehabilitation procedures. The highly detailed and comprehensive digital models have simplified to think about the different scale perception experiences and topographical effects.
作为项目最关键的决定之一，我们阐述了从周围建筑模式中衍生出来的各种碎片化的可能性，而不是对复杂的办公建筑进行全盘的approach。我们建议，这种碎片化会更有诱惑力，因为它将在管理和营销过程中提供灵活的使用机会。同时，这种抽象化的过程被利用来细化与表面有关的决定。质量和空隙比例的参数，颜色和纹理的效果，内部和外部的感知，照明水平和自然通风是表面和材料选择的标准。
As one of the most critical decisions of the project, the various possibilities of the fragmentation that is the derived from the surrounding building pattern was elaborated rather thanthetotalitarianapproachofthefamiliarofficebuildings. Itwasproposedthatthiskind of fragmentation would be more enticing as it would provide flexible use opportunities in the management and marketing processes. Parallelly, this abstraction process was utilized by slenderizing the decisions related to surfaces.The parameters of the mass and void proportions, the effects of the colors and textures, the inside and outside perceptions, the lighting levels and the natural ventilation were criterias for the surface and material choices.
在这一阶段的评估中，面对投资者的传统期望，这些方法与最近的普通办公室相差甚远，通过这种方式创造共同的理解和钦佩的平台，是一个必须克服的问题。
In this phase it was evaluated that , confronting the conventional expectations of the investors with these approaches that are nowhere near the recent generic offices and by this creating common apprehension and admiration platforms, have been a problem that had to be overcome.
在这个意义上，投资者集团代表提出的积极倡议和理解力，一直在解决和促进。我们希望这个项目将是一个值得注意的例子，甚至是对该地区不可避免的转型的激励。
In this sense the positive initiative and comprehension that the investor group representative have put forth, have been resolving and facilitating. We hope that this project will be a noteworthy example and even an inspiration for the inevitable transformation that the region will go through.
Architects: EAA – Emre Arolat Architecture
Area : 30000 m²
Year : 2007
City：ISTANBUL
Country：Turkey